|
Please feel free to correct any egregious errors in a comment. This accounts for many features of his history- not least the annual listing of who served in what office, what were the auguries that occured during that year and what fantastic omens occurred.So, in effect, what we have in Livy could be considered a historical novel with few clear lines as to when the novel ends and the history begins. He is trying to remind his compatriots of the greatness that was Rome.What he writes in this volume is a sort of national hagiography. We learn of wonderful, complicated figures such as Marcus Furius Camillus or Coriolanus.The final argument I will make for a reading of Livy in this brief space is that he serves as an entry point to understanding so many other people and events in later history.
He is a delight to read, he expands your soul and his history is a great medicine for any mind.p.s. We are guided through the almost annual depradations by the dastardly Volscians or the pesky Aequian on through the destruction of Veii and then the sacking of Rome by the Gauls. Learn, I must. I recommend T.J. Unless I am mistaken, he was largely dependent on the annalistic historical tradition.
Arguably he changed the history of political theory in so doing.Another example- Shakespeare based his Roman plays on Livy and Plutarch.And finally while Livy may not be Roman history as we would understand that term, he is the best of all possible places to start your study of Roman history. To start on Livy in the Penguin Classics edition is to start a reading project of well over two thousand pages.The answer to the question is dependent on what you are looking for. He does so by telling small sequential stories that have moral climaxes usually in a great speech by one of the Romans, speeches that we can only regard as having been totally made up and which share many tropes with the speeches in Homer among other writers.We apparently have few of the sources that Livy used in his history. Even in a long life, there are only so many books you can read. Cornell's The Beginnings of Rome instead.My point is that Livy is not writing history as we know it.
My title comes from Livy's opening page and it speaks to what I think is the essential point that one has to think about when deciding whether or not to read Livy. We come to realize that during this period Rome never started the trouble with the neighbors. There is much reference within Madison's Notes to what he learned in Livy among other writers.Another example- Machiavelli wrote his Discourses as a commentary on Livy. to 390 BC)is not for you. It is one of Livy's more obvious moral lessons that the one time that they did start the trouble, the city was sacked. That is an important point to grasp in the study of any people.
And, by the way, I think that is a serious question. It fit the Roman self-image. His history was very popular. These writers influenced our history directly. For example, our Founding Fathers (no such men exist these days).felt that the history contained in writers like Livy and Plutarch provided the knowledge needed for understanding government and the world of politics. He tells the stories of Aeneus, of Romulus and Remus, of the Tarquins, of the rape of the Sabines, the rape of Lucretia, the battle of the Horatii and the Curiatii, of the fall of the kings, the creation of the consuls, the struggles of the plebians(yeah).
As is probably obvious, I am new to study of ancient history and philosophy.
Livy is the best door through which to enter.
Livy wrote a really good historical novel if such it is.
Rome and her history await you in all her glory.
If you are looking to a well-researched history of early Rome then this volume of Livy (which covers Rome from its founding in the sixth century B.C.E.
Read the debates at the Constitutional Convention.
and the patricians(boo)., the creation of the tribunate, and the creation of the military tribunes.
In his introduction, Livy makes it clear that he is trying to hold up to the watered-down Romans of his day the distant mirror of the Romans of the past.
I would guess that the later volumes are founded on more solid history (as we define it) but I reserve judgment on that until I read those later volumes.But here is the thing.
Highly recommended. For comparative Indo-European studies, as well as studies into early Rome, this work is indispensable.The translation is quite accessible. When I rate works in translation I do so based on accessibility of translation, significance of work, and any issues of accuracy I could find.Livy's work is quite significant though probably of limited historical value (as the introduction discusses). On the other hand, some philologists have found Livy's work (including Dumezil) to contain patters common to other Indo-European societies and hence probably based on earlier oral and epic traditions which do not come down to us from other sources.
Such a shame. well part of the saga where lost. A great book. The only problem.
deception, hurbris, cunning, avrice.and a the glory that was once Rome. This book has done that perfectly.The writting is smooth and its an easy read. In it you find the drama and passion and glory of Roman thru Roman eyes and watch as the.Culture, not just the city or the army, grows into a world power.Its everything you will find in any TV drama. I'm an amateur of classical Roman history. It makes a perfect excuse for an european vacation.and when you know the back ground of the sites you are visiting, the whole thing comes alive.One thing I really learned in this text is that history, espically ancient history, is a mixture of reality and myth. Nothing published, no letters after my name.just a passion for all things Roman. You may learn some facts about events, but moreso, you see how these events were precieved by the participants based on their world view.
Every important battle or event seems to be introduced with parragraphs on the different augurs, premonitions and superstitions the Romans had before a big event took place. I was delighted to see the Iberian leaders portrayed with a human face, balancing the pros and cons of which empire to follow, Rome or Carthage. If you don't get discouraged with so much information, irrelevant to us much of it, it will get to be a fully satisfying experience at the end. Pages filled with lots of details and accounts of almost day by day life in the Roman Empire around 200 BC. You'll think you've been in all those places, you sweat, and even hurt yourself while running away from one of those African elephants. The movement of troops here and there, the decision making in the Roman Senate and accross the Empire, the little barbarian rulers trying to maintain their particular fiefdoms while deciding which neighbor they should pay tribute to: Rome eventually being the better choice. Oh, my.
What is also a little tedious is the constant mentioning of names of personages who occupied different offices during the times of the events in question. To be read in small takes, digesting it well, otherwise. May be too much, with no time to pause and meditate. He could have done without that too. Facts, action, facts, action.
It's about 700 pages long, not at all pithy mind you. It was like geopolitcs for dummies, only 200 BC. You get to see what was going on in the Italian peninsula, Hispania, north of Africa. Livy wastes a little too much ink on those details. But take this out, and skip that other thing, the book is an invaluable testimony of the times, a great canvas of the Roman Empire at its greatest moment: the duel with Carthage; Scipio vs Hannibal.It's like reading a daily of more than 2000 years ago, only better.
|
